Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Current Hits
-
BOY : May I hold your hand? GIRL : No thanks, it isn't heavy GIRL : Say you love me! Say you love me! BOY : You love me... GIRL : If w... -
Who says today’s kids aren’t smart? Well, some of them are! I wish I’d thought of this ... At a high school in Montana a group of stu...
-
There's a fine line between fishing and standing on the shore like an idiot. Did you ever walk into a room and forget why you walked in...
-
Albert Einstein is best mind known to human. He was the most Intellectual person ever. But still he had a funny side to him. Following are s...
Posts
Not really a blooper, there's a history to this: http://www.ubr.com/clocks/frequently-asked-questions-faq/faq-roman-iiii-vs-iv-on-clock-dials.aspx
ReplyDeleteactually, IV is only a common change. For centuries, IIII was the norm.
ReplyDeletehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roman_numerals#IIII_vs._IV
It's not much of a blooper, IIII was as acceptable as IV in Roman numerals. Plenty of examples in old literature....I'd drop this one if I was you...
ReplyDeleteTop site though,
Happy Subscriber.
This is correct!
ReplyDeleteIIII i used because it visually balances VIII better than IV does.