Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Current Hits
-
1. I can only please one person per day. Today is not your day. Tomorrow is not looking good either. 2. I ...
-
The average bed is home to over 6 billion dust mites. Just twenty seconds worth of fuel remained when Apollo 11's lunar module landed on...
-
Breaking: Donald Trump announces Delores Umbridge as the new US Secretary of Education
-
BOY : May I hold your hand? GIRL : No thanks, it isn't heavy GIRL : Say you love me! Say you love me! BOY : You love me... GIRL : If w... -
One sunny day in 2009, an old man approached the White House from across Pennsylvania Ave, where he’d been sitting on a park bench. He spoke...
Not really a blooper, there's a history to this: http://www.ubr.com/clocks/frequently-asked-questions-faq/faq-roman-iiii-vs-iv-on-clock-dials.aspx
ReplyDeleteactually, IV is only a common change. For centuries, IIII was the norm.
ReplyDeletehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roman_numerals#IIII_vs._IV
It's not much of a blooper, IIII was as acceptable as IV in Roman numerals. Plenty of examples in old literature....I'd drop this one if I was you...
ReplyDeleteTop site though,
Happy Subscriber.
This is correct!
ReplyDeleteIIII i used because it visually balances VIII better than IV does.